What Diamond Shape Should I Get on an Engagement Ring?

<P><p><div><p>i might first of waiting your factors of interest elow the two.4k ecause of the fact it is not likely you will get that value for it after that's already een offered as quickly as. easily ass forward and send the quantity (in case you could locate the money for it) to have it araised at an area jewelry kee. Then ass around to community jewelry shos and make certain which of them are rocuring. i does not advise going to a awnsho ecause of the fact that's the lace you will get ried off the main. as quickly as araised, in case you would e unale to locate a kee to sell it too, then look at innovations like advertising the hoo y the classifieds element of your community newsaer or on we content like Eay. as quickly as returned, greater funds for the commercial, yet having the hoo offered is greater advantageous than it sitting on your faric wardroe amassing airorne dirt and dirt. additionally, I asically had to assert i've got faith you're justified in retaining the hoo. in case you roke it off or if it ecame into mutual, i might agree that it's going to e ack. yet once you have wraed u issues at domicile in asic terms to make certain you resently have not have een given any the lace to stay and no astime (as a effect no income) sell the gorgeous gem for the gorgeous enny. A roken wallet desires reayment</p></P><P><img src="https://img.yfisher.com/1633679123099.jpg" style="margin:10px auto"></P><P><p><b> Related Questions</b></p><p>2-3 carat Diamond engagement rings?</p><p>The rolem with rincess cuts is that the majority of the weight of the stone is in the avilion (ottom). They look much smaller than any other shae diamond of similar weight. Because of this fact, they do indeed tend to set higher u than other shaes, since they are a deeer stone. Also, there are 4 corners on a rincess cut, all sujected to chiing off if they get hit hard enough. Even more, rincess cuts are the "in" shae right now. In 30 years, a rincess cut will look dated, kind of like marquee cuts do that everyone ought ack in the 1980s do right now. This will also affect the value the diamond holds over time, as the shae falls out of style, market demand lessens, and so will the value of your stone. Then again, there will inevitaly come a time when it e ones a "classic" look out of a certain time eriod, like my emerald cut diamond (out of the 1920s) I inherited from my grandma. Not a oular shae anymore, ut certainly has that "vintage" look ecause it is.</p><p>This all, of course, is a matter of ersonal reference. If that's what you like and are hay with, then y all means look for a nice rincess cut. Everyone likes something different, or else everyone would have a round diamond in a solitaire mounting. Even though it hasn't een a "oular" cut for 60 years, I actually love my emerald cut diamond. It has a different sarkle than rilliant cuts do (retty much every modern diamond is a rilliant cut, just different shaes), since it is a ste-cut and I think it's eautiful ecause of the simlicity (lus I just tend to like old things). If your heart is set on a nice rincess cut, and you know aout and accet the 2 major "negative" factors to that shae, then why wouldn't you get one?</p></P><P><img src="https://img.yfisher.com/1630563740520.jpg" style="margin:10px auto"></P><P><p></p>------<p>Would you buy from the site Secret-Diamond.com?</P><P>the problem with clarity enhanced diamonds or fracture filled diamonds is that the material they fill the diamond with can yellow with age or if the stone is near any type of heat and some chemicals. And I hope you are not planning on doing so without telling her because when she finds out, and she will, because jewelers will be able to tell, she will be very upset.</P><P>My suggestion, find a ring you can afford. Here are some alternatives: this .90ct oval will look nearly the size of a 1.5ct round and a 2.0 carat princess cut but is a natural stone: Here are some loose diamonds all under $3000: </p>------<p>Which quality is best in an engagement ring?</P><P>There are a lot of things to consider here. Cut, table depth percentages, length width ratios, girdle ect.</P><P>Cut is superior, then clarity. Color is more subjective. Given the lower clarity ratings suggest looking at the diamond under a loupe and note where the inclusions are. Also look at what is more appeasing to your eye as far as length width. You can see what they recommend the preferred ranges to be. I like a fuller pear, I think on a pear over 1ct that is 1.65:1 or 1.75:1 is not flattering. I prefer the 1.35:1-1.45:1 but not more than 1.5:1. now this one is 1.33:1 and is 8.15x6.12 even though its 1.19ct</P><P>here is a 1.10 pear that is 1.63:1 and look at the length 9.25x5.69 I would not want a ring that long that's crazy Do you really want a ring with that kind of length? I can palm a basketball and no way would I want a diamond over 7mm long regardless of shape. I prefer quality, better clarity, and smaller. I wouldn't go this big, but that is what you want .90 G/VS2</P><P>l/w 1.38, 3,730 dollars 7.62x5.53x3.42mm (this ex. is demonstration purposes, this is no good with an extremely thick girdle) if I were picking a pear diamond, I'd want the length upper 6mm and width greater than 5.0, girdle medium</P><P>this .72ct pear G/VS1 very good cut, medium girdle l/w 1.44:1 and costs 2215 measures 7.40x5.15x3.21mm</P><P>I do have a pear diamond, this was upgraded, we were limited on funds. its 6mmx4mm .34ct and people always thought it was 1/2 carat. This is an H/SI1</P><P>My upgraded ring is .89ct E/VVS2 emerald with these dimensions 6.77x5.02x2.92mm l/w 1.34:1 emerald l/w is recommended 1.30-1.40. (I was shooting for 7x5 because that looks best imo</p>------<p>What kind of ring would look good on a larger finger?</P><P>I have large fingers too. You do not need larger than 1ct. Go with a fancy shape, and a solitaire on a thin band. A thick band looks like a girdle with a muffin top on a large finger. My ring is size 10. I have .89ct emerald shape diamond on a 2.5mm band.</P><P>A square or round look is not flattering on larger fingers. Stick to emerald, oval, pear, or radiant and shoot for a 7mmx5mm sized stone. These stones look larger on the carat wt. Only thing is for an emerald the clarity must be VS2 or better and on the radiant the l/w ratio should be 1.20:1</P><P>Adiamor is an affordable reputable site: pear .83 H/VS2 7.70mmx5.41mmx3.31mm for 1819 radiant 1.01 H/SI1 7.31mmx5.18mmx3.24mm for 2,813 radiant 1.01 I/VS2 7.07mmx5.41mmx3.33mm for 3,259 oval .80 G/VS1 7.08mmx5.37mmx3.27mm for 2,187 oval .91ct D/VS2 7.47mmx5.64mmx3.46mm for 3,031 oval .96ct F/VS2 7.71mmx5.56mmx3.38mm for 3,142 emerald 1.01 H/VVS2 6.95mmx5.02mmx3.18mm for 3,248 for the setting suggest the knife edge that is 2.4-2.7mm thick and costs 246 in 14k white gold or 709 in platinum</P><P>If you call them, they will be able to accommodate your size</P><P>All of these are premium cut, no fluorescence, have good girdles, good length/width ratios and have good table/depth percentages, GIA certified</p>------<p>What is a good respectable price andout style for an engagement ring?</P><P>If you believe the diamond industry advice (&amp; I don't) they recommend spending 6 months salary on a diamond engagement ring. For a full-time, minimum wage earner (i.e. the cheapest) that comes to $7482.00</P><P>But consider this, diamonds are controlled by the De Beers cartel. Here's a quote: De Beers chairman Nicky Oppenheimer said it best: "diamonds are intrinsically worthless, except for the deep psychological need they fill." (Link 1, section 5)</P><P>Now scroll down to part 9, "Diamonds are Actually Lousy Investments." The summary of that section is that diamonds go DOWN in value very quickly. As in, from the day you purchase it.</P><P>There is no scarcity of diamonds. There is a scarcity of the amount of diamonds that the cartel *releases* to the public every year.</P><P>I would consult your fiance as to the type of engagement ring she wants. I don't know how financially well off you are, but taking on thousands of dollars in debt at the beginning of a marriage is a big decision. I have a diamond ring I never wear. I have many alternative stone rings I do wear that all look like engagement rings. I'm always getting complimented on them. I little too much in that they *bling* so much I get scared a thief will think they are real. They are good stones equal in value to a diamond. (The real value of a diamond.)</P><P>I'm partial to Moisanite b/c it has TWICE the sparkle of a diamond. It's has a durable hardness rating of 9.25, just short of the 10.0 of a diamond. (Link 2)</P><P>Take a look at some in link 3</P><P>Myself? I'd get a loose stone (princess or radiant cut has the most sparkle) &amp; mount it in titanium.</P><P>See link 4 for a $445 stone that's 1.17 carats</P><P>Link 5 has titanium ring mounts. Why titanium? B/c it's strength will last a long time &amp; handle more accidental situations than soft gold. It's the wedding ring used in the movie, "Abyss." They offer unique mounts to fit any personality.</P><P>Link 6 shows more stones but I couldn't find prices listed.</P><P>In the end, for around $3000 you can have a creative ring mount with a stone that offers more sparkle than a diamond at the same value, but for 1/5th the price. You can make this truly your own &amp; it will get a lot of notice.</P><P>But that's just me rejecting being a slave to some diamond cartels propaganda &amp; thinking creatively on my own. I'd much rather design a ring with my husband to be. And start my marriage without the pressures of debt. You can always drip her in diamonds pendants &amp; earrings as they go on sale later in life. Why don't you find out how she feels about the matter?</p></div></p></P>